I'm a well read grad student who's bluntly honest about all things, although I try to be most honest about myself.
As mind bending, or as semantic as these books get, it could be dry. Some of the ways things like metadata are talked about are dry: it's very much about dissecting what it is, and how to use metadata.
I'm pretty fanatic about this type of logical structure, although I may not seem like it all the time. I suck at using tags in BL, but I get upset when things are mistagged. I just know it's a 'me' thing so I suck it up and either fix it if I made a mistake, or know that sometimes they're going to be wrong, at least from my point of view, because different perspectives. (Or even someone just being wrong. It does happen sometimes: if it's labeled vampires and there are none, well...)
Point is, I like this.