I'm a well read grad student who's bluntly honest about all things, although I try to be most honest about myself.

From this thread.
That's from Tim Spalding, LTs creator, by the way. So remember, if you're going to call an author an idiot on LT, do it in a review, not when chatting with them.
Why do I find all of this so funnY? 'Slamming an author' in a review or not sounds a little blunt. And I find the very distinction funny, although I understand both: he's addressing legitimate concerns here.
I also like that you can call a shelf 'author is an idiot,' or something like that. Since this is a collection of books you're interested as opposed to showing degree of interest in, you must be interested in the books you're shelving. Not for me/Will not buy is not allowed. Other shelf names are allowed, so long as you can prove correlation to the books. Books you want? Hard to interrogate everyone for their intent. Having a Daredevil shelf and posting all DC books would be odd and have no correlation. Bizarre, but not harmful in my opinion, but their ToS requires correlation and this would have no correlation as they'd be published by someone who owns no rights to DD. (I do have a DD shelf, so used it as an example.)